毛发修复手术

Edited BY DR. Phatcharasak Kraisornphongsakul

Hair loss is a common concern, and advancements in hair transplantation offer effective solutions. This article explores two popular techniques: Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) and Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT). Understanding their pros and cons can empower you to choose the best approach for your hair restoration journey.

Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE)

The Technique: FUE involves extracting individual follicular units, the natural groupings of hair, directly from the donor area (usually the back of the scalp). This is done using a specialized punch instrument, minimizing scarring.

Pros

• Minimal scarring: FUE leaves only tiny dot-like scars, making it ideal for those who prefer short hairstyles or want undetectable scarring.

• Shorter recovery time: FUE generally boasts a faster recovery time compared to FUT.

• Less discomfort: Patients often report less during and after FUE surgery.

• Donor flexibility: FUE can harvest hair from areas outside the scalp, like the beard, for those with limited scalp donor availability.

Cons

• Time-consuming process: Extracting individual follicles is more laborious, leading to longer surgery times.

• Cost: FUE can be slightly more expensive due to the increased time and expertise required.

• Graft survival rate: FUE can have a slightly lower graft survival rate compared to FUT, though improvements in technique are minimizing this difference.

   

Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT)

The Technique: FUT involves removing a thin strip of scalp containing healthy hair follicles from the donor area. This strip is then meticulously dissected into individual follicular units for transplantation into the recipient area.

Pros

• Cost-effective: FUT is generally less expensive FUE due to the shorter surgery time.

• Higher graft yield: FUT often yields a higher number of usable hair follicles for transplantation.

• Suitable for large areas: FUT is a good option for covering extensive hair loss areas.

Cons

• Linear scar: FUT leaves a linear scar at the donor site, which might be noticeable for those who prefer short hairstyles.

• Longer recovery time: FUT has a longer healing period due to the larger surgical wound.

• Increased discomfort: Patients might experience more discomfort compared to FUE, especially in the initial stages.

• Limited donor flexibility: Hair can only be harvested from the designated scalp donor area.

Choosing Between FUE and FUT

The ideal technique depends on individual factors like:

• Extent of hair loss: FUT might be suitable for larger areas, while FUE could be preferable for smaller areas or those seeking minimal scarring.

• Scalp laxity: FUT may be more suitable for patients with looser scalp tissue.

• Hair type: FUE is generally a good choice for all hair types.

• Cost considerations: FUT might be more budget-friendly.

• Desired scarring outcome: FUE offers minimal scarring, while FUT leaves a linear scar.

Consultation is Key

Consulting a qualified hair transplant surgeon is crucial. They will assess your hair loss pattern, scalp condition, and desired outcome to recommend the most suitable technique and tailor a treatment plan for success.

Remember

Both FUE and FUT, when performed by experienced professionals, can achieve excellent hair restoration results. Understanding their pros and cons empowers you to have informed discussions with your doctor and make the best decision for your journey towards a fuller head of hair.

Dr. Patcharasak Klaisarapongsakul

Specialist in cosmetic surgery and special plastic surgery 
32 years of experience

1100 treatments perfomed

1986 Doctor of Medicine, Khon Kaen University

1992 Certificate of General Medicine, 
Faculty of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital

2001 Certificate of Plastic Medicine, 
Faculty of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital